The political landscape within Zanu PF has grown increasingly volatile as rumors swirl around a constitutional amendment that could extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s stay in power.
At the center of the brewing storm is John Paradza, deputy secretary of the Zanu PF Youth League. Allegedly, Paradza has been traversing the nation, seeking support from party members to push for this amendment at the upcoming Zanu PF conference.
This initiative, which has garnered vocal support from the Midlands and Masvingo provinces, is not without opposition. The notion of extending Mnangagwa’s term beyond the current constitutional limits has triggered a wave of infighting within Zanu PF.
The situation is so heated that some have resorted to using insults during party gatherings. Midlands Provincial Affairs Minister Owen Ncube, in a recent rally, directed derogatory slogans toward those critical of Mnangagwa’s extended term.
Ncube’s attack focused on Munyaradzi Shoko, a member of the Children of the War Veterans Association. His response to Ncube’s slurs underscores the growing tensions within the ruling party: “My crime is defending the Zimbabwean constitution… Now I am living in the bush.”
Reports indicate that Paradza’s initial focus was on provincial chairpersons, but his efforts have expanded to unemployed Zanu PF youth across the nation. Despite these allegations, Paradza has firmly denied any involvement in such constitutional discussions, asserting that a recent youth meeting had no such agenda.
Youth Empowerment Minister Tinoda Machakaire also weighed in, advising young Zanu PF members to stay clear of divisive politics. Machakaire emphasized unity and respect for leadership as the guiding principles for the party’s future.
Notably, a group identifying as the General Chiwenga Voluntary Supporters Association has emerged, calling on Zimbabweans to resist the 2030 agenda. They argue that Zimbabwe’s constitution must be respected, emphasizing that no one should tamper with its provisions.
At 82, Mnangagwa is currently serving his second and final term as outlined by Zimbabwe’s constitution. The constitution clearly states that a president can only serve a maximum of two terms. Yet, the rumblings of a potential third term indicate that the battle over the future of Zimbabwe’s leadership is far from over.
For many, this struggle represents more than a mere political maneuver; it strikes at the heart of Zimbabwe’s democratic values. Extending a presidential term threatens the very foundations of a system built on checks and balances.
The constitution, a vital document that ensures the nation’s governance is accountable and fair, should not be easily altered. Any changes that undermine these safeguards risk creating instability and further polarizing an already divided nation.
The loyalty of Zanu PF’s youth has become a crucial factor in this unfolding political drama. Paradza’s efforts to galvanize support amongst this group suggest that the youth hold considerable power in shaping the party’s future direction.
As the Zanu PF conference approaches, the nation waits with bated breath. Will the ruling party embrace constitutional integrity, or will it succumb to the temptations of extending power?
The stakes are high. Zimbabwe’s path forward depends on the decisions made in these critical weeks. Whatever the outcome, the impact will resonate not just within party ranks but throughout the nation, affecting its political and social fabric.
This infighting reflects larger questions about leadership and governance in Zimbabwe. How will future generations of leaders honor the constitution? Will they place the country’s future over individual ambitions?
While Paradza’s denials may temporarily quell some concerns, the underlying tension remains. Zimbabwe’s constitution, a cornerstone of democracy, must be defended with integrity, ensuring that its principles are upheld without bending to political pressure.
The story unfolding within Zanu PF is a powerful reminder that politics is never just about power—it’s about the future of a nation. And that future must be protected, with respect for its laws, its people, and its leaders.