Tensions are rising within South Africa’s ruling parties, as the Democratic Alliance (DA) responds to reports suggesting that Basic Education Minister Siviwe Gwarube could be fired.
The controversy stems from Gwarube’s opposition to the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act. Sources claim ANC members are pressuring President Cyril Ramaphosa to remove her from office.
DA leader John Steenhuisen quickly issued a statement, condemning any attempt to remove Gwarube. He warned that such an action would bring an end to the Government of National Unity (GNU).
Steenhuisen emphasized that Gwarube, as a DA member, was simply doing her job by opposing the BELA Act. He stressed the importance of respecting her position in government.
He also clarified the misunderstanding surrounding the ongoing consultation process over the BELA Act. Steenhuisen pointed out that these talks were separate from any political dispute and required by law.
The consultations aim to resolve issues raised by stakeholders like trade union Solidarity. The union filed a dispute over the Act, leading to negotiations involving Gwarube, the Presidency, and NEDLAC.
The DA leader expressed disappointment over the Presidency distancing itself from these legislated consultations. He called the move both confusing and disgraceful, stressing that the process was necessary to prevent strike action.
The DA continues to support Gwarube’s approach, as she was fulfilling her legal duties. Steenhuisen reaffirmed the party’s commitment to inclusive economic growth, job creation, and adherence to South Africa’s constitutional framework.
The BELA Act, passed in October 2023, aims to address imbalances in school admissions and language policies. However, the implementation of certain clauses has been delayed to allow for discussions and proposals.
Clauses 4 and 5 of the Act are particularly contentious. Clause 4 would give the Basic Education Department authority to direct schools to enroll more pupils. The DA fears this could undermine the autonomy of School Governing Bodies (SGBs).
Clause 5, which allows provincial departments to modify schools’ language policies, is also under scrutiny. The DA argues it could endanger mother-tongue education and marginalize certain cultures.
Along with other stakeholders, the DA has called for these clauses to be excluded from the Act to preserve peace and stability in schools.