Chamisa’s Legal Advisor Slams Mnangagwa’s Move to Extend ZDF Commander’s Tenure

Thabani Mpofu, a prominent legal figure, has lambasted President Emmerson Mnangagwa for extending General Philip Valerio Sibanda’s role as ZDF Commander beyond the retirement age.

Sibanda turned 70 on December 24, 2024, which, according to Mpofu, should legally terminate his active service.

Mpofu took to social media to voice his criticism, calling the decision “flawed” due to its legal inconsistencies.

He highlighted that once an official hits retirement age, they should no longer occupy active positions.

The extension was detailed in General Notice 15 of 2025, issued on January 3, 2025, extending Sibanda’s command until November 23, 2025.

Mpofu critiqued this move on two grounds: firstly, an expired term cannot be extended.

He likened this to “no oxygen canisters at the cemetery,” emphasizing the finality of retirement.

Secondly, Mpofu argued that after reaching 70, one cannot simultaneously retire and serve.

He cautioned against “planting a dead log,” suggesting that this is an attempt to recycle ineffective leadership.

This decision, Mpofu posits, is a clear maneuver by Mnangagwa to consolidate power, possibly eyeing a third term.

He sees this as part of a disturbing pattern in Zimbabwe’s governance, marked by “absurdities and illegalities.”

Mpofu’s sharp critique reflects broader concerns about the rule of law and democratic practices in Zimbabwe.

Sibanda has held the ZDF command since 2017, succeeding Vice President Constantino Chiwenga.

This move by Mnangagwa has sparked a debate on the integrity of state institutions and the respect for legal frameworks.

Mpofu’s comments resonate with those worried about the direction of political power and military involvement in politics.

The extension of Sibanda’s term comes amid recent changes in Zimbabwe’s security leadership.

Mpofu’s critique underscores the tension between maintaining military leadership continuity and respecting legal retirement norms.

He warns that such actions could undermine public trust in governmental processes and legal structures.

The debate over Sibanda’s extended tenure is not just about one man’s career but about the broader implications for Zimbabwe’s democracy.

Mpofu’s outspoken critique has placed a spotlight on the need for transparency and adherence to legal norms in governmental decisions.

His remarks are part of a growing discourse on governance and the role of the military in Zimbabwe’s political landscape.

This situation highlights the delicate balance between security, governance, and the rule of law in the nation.

As Zimbabwe navigates these complex issues, the actions of its leaders will continue to be scrutinized by legal minds like Mpofu.

The controversy over Sibanda’s term extension is a testament to the ongoing struggle for democratic integrity in Zimbabwe.

Mpofu’s legal analysis provides a critical perspective on how such decisions might shape the country’s political future.

His critique is a call to action for upholding constitutional principles over political expediency.

This development in Zimbabwe’s political saga is one to watch as it unfolds in the coming months.