Zambia has emerged as a focal point for the United Nations, with a recent call from a UN expert urging the nation to reinforce its democratic institutions. This plea, issued amidst the backdrop of Zambia’s evolving political landscape, not only resonates within the country but also invites a comparative glance at its neighbor, Zimbabwe—a nation where democracy has often been under siege.
Zambia’s journey through the corridors of democracy has been anything but straightforward. Since gaining independence from British colonial rule in 1964, the country has oscillated between periods of democratic engagement and autocratic governance.
The recent appeal by the UN expert underscores the fragility of Zambia’s democratic structures, which, despite notable progress, remain vulnerable to the vagaries of political power plays and economic instability.
The UN’s appeal is a reminder of the importance of nurturing democracy in a region where authoritarian tendencies often threaten to overshadow democratic ideals.
In Zambia, the return to multiparty democracy in 1991 was a pivotal moment, yet the years that followed have seen challenges to political freedoms and the rule of law.
The expert’s call to action reflects a broader concern that without robust democratic institutions, Zambia’s progress could be undermined, potentially leading to a backslide into authoritarianism.
The situation in Zambia invites inevitable comparisons with Zimbabwe, where the erosion of democratic norms has been a longstanding issue. Since Robert Mugabe’s ouster in 2017, Zimbabwe has struggled to rebuild its democratic foundations.
The ongoing challenges faced by Zimbabwe highlight the consequences of failing to protect democratic institutions, offering a cautionary tale for Zambia.
Zimbabwe’s experience serves as a stark reminder that the dismantling of democracy can have long-lasting and far-reaching consequences, not only for political stability but also for economic development and social cohesion.
In both Zambia and Zimbabwe, the role of civil society and the media in safeguarding democracy cannot be overstated. These actors play a critical role in holding governments accountable, promoting transparency, and ensuring that the voices of ordinary citizens are heard.
The UN expert’s call for stronger democratic institutions in Zambia is a recognition of the need to protect these vital components of democracy from encroachment by state power.
However, while the comparison between Zambia and Zimbabwe offers valuable insights, it is also important to acknowledge the unique context of each country. Zambia’s democratic journey has been shaped by its own historical, cultural, and economic factors, which differ from those of Zimbabwe.
For instance, Zambia’s peaceful transition of power in 2021, following the election of President Hakainde Hichilema, stands in contrast to the more tumultuous political transitions seen in Zimbabwe.
This distinction highlights the potential for Zambia to chart a different course—one that strengthens its democratic institutions and ensures the continued participation of its citizens in the political process.
The UN expert’s appeal also raises important questions about the role of the international community in supporting democracy in Africa. While external pressure can be a catalyst for change, it is ultimately up to the people of Zambia to determine the future of their democracy.
The expert’s call should be seen as an opportunity for Zambians to reflect on the state of their democracy and to take proactive steps to strengthen it. This might involve reforms to enhance the independence of the judiciary, measures to protect the rights of the media, or initiatives to increase political participation among marginalized groups.
As Zambia navigates these challenges, it must do so with an eye on both its past and its future. The lessons from Zimbabwe offer valuable insights, but they also serve as a reminder that Zambia’s destiny lies in its own hands.
By strengthening its democratic institutions, Zambia can avoid the pitfalls that have plagued its neighbor and ensure that it remains a beacon of democracy in the region.
The call for stronger democracy in Zambia is not just about safeguarding political freedoms; it is also about ensuring that the country’s development is sustainable and inclusive.
In the absence of strong democratic institutions, there is a risk that economic gains could be undermined by corruption, mismanagement, or political instability. This is a lesson that Zimbabwe has learned the hard way, and one that Zambia must heed if it is to secure a brighter future for its people.
The call to strengthen democracy in Zambia is both timely and necessary. As Zambia reflects on its democratic journey, it must do so with a sense of urgency and a commitment to protecting the institutions that underpin its democracy. By doing so, Zambia can not only avoid the mistakes of its neighbors but also set a positive example for the region as a whole.
The road ahead may be challenging, but with determination and foresight, Zambia can continue to build a democracy that is strong, resilient, and inclusive.
More: The Zim Bulletin News