Mliswa Cautions ZANU PF Cadres Amid Politburo’s High-Stakes Gathering

In the heart of Zimbabwe’s political dynamics, former Norton legislator Temba Mliswa issued a cautionary note to ZANU PF members as the party’s Politburo convened for a crucial session.

This gathering, referred to by Mliswa as an “Extra-Ordinary session,” has heightened tension among party members, many of whom are bracing for the potential disciplinary actions that may follow.

Mliswa, known for his forthright remarks, suggested that this particular session might bring “extra-ordinary measures,” hinting at a wave of suspensions and disciplinary actions within the ruling party.

“Expect extra-ordinary measures from an Extra-Ordinary session of the Politburo,” Mliswa warned, suggesting that the atmosphere within ZANU PF is charged with underlying political tension. This stance, he explains, could lead to an increase in votes of no confidence and other disciplinary proceedings.

The meeting arrives at a time of heightened intrigue within ZANU PF, as discussions on party leadership, internal power shifts, and the controversial topic of constitutional amendments loom in the background. Mliswa’s comments capture this mood, as he references “mhepo dzasimuka” (winds of change), a Shona phrase signaling an intensifying political climate that he believes could sweep some members off course.

For Mliswa, the best strategy for ZANU PF members to navigate this volatile atmosphere is to “lie low.” He urged party members to avoid drawing attention to themselves during this period, warning that any attempt to “shine too much” could lead to undesired consequences.

“This is not the time for one to be a center of attraction,” Mliswa cautioned, adding that party members should remain cautious and avoid stepping into the political limelight.

Mliswa’s position within ZANU PF remains complex. Often perceived as an influential figure with ties to First Lady Auxillia Mnangagwa, his voice carries weight among party members, adding a sense of urgency to his recent warnings.

His advisory, layered with undertones of past political turmoil, underscores the potential consequences for those who ignore the caution to keep a low profile.

The current Politburo session is also unfolding amidst long-standing debates around constitutional amendments, a contentious issue within the party. Mliswa’s remarks hinted at an opposition to constitutional changes, a stance he believes aligns with public sentiment.

He highlighted the peculiar situation, noting, “It’s uncanny how all things — from ED to the public — seem against changes to the Constitution.” Yet, he observed, the topic persists, suggesting that unseen forces within the party keep the issue on the table, lending credence to his advice.

The warning is timely as discussions around constitutional changes could further stoke political tensions. By advising members to refrain from becoming “main faces” in these high-stakes debates, Mliswa underscores his understanding of the party’s internal machinations. His comments serve as a subtle reminder that political ambitions and overt visibility could invite trouble.

As ZANU PF’s Politburo session unfolds, Mliswa’s voice stands as both a reflection of his experiences and an advisory rooted in caution. His remarks carry an implicit understanding of the high-stakes political game within the party and the calculated risks that members must take.

While some may view his caution as overly conservative, his emphasis on restraint could be crucial for those navigating the complexities of Zimbabwe’s ruling party dynamics.

Mliswa’s advisory underscores the complex political realities within ZANU PF, a party that has long witnessed power shifts and internal power struggles. His insights reflect a political landscape where influence is not always synonymous with visibility, and where discretion may be the best defense for ambitious cadres looking to secure their positions.

The Politburo’s discussions will undoubtedly impact the political landscape in Zimbabwe, and Mliswa’s words serve as a sobering reminder of the delicate balancing act required within ZANU PF. For the party members, the path forward is filled with both opportunity and risk — and Mliswa’s advice offers a strategic lens through which they might choose to navigate the turbulent waters of Zimbabwe’s political scene.

The Zim Bulletin