In a recent revelation, ZANU PF provincial bodies have accused businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei of fueling internal conflicts within the ruling party.
At President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s farm, an intense discussion unfolded, where provincial leaders voiced their concerns against Tagwirei’s influence.
The meeting, spearheaded by Owen “Mudha” Ncube, highlighted Tagwirei’s financial backing of opposing factions, which has stirred unrest within ZANU PF’s ranks.
The division lies between Mnangagwa and his deputy, Constantino Chiwenga, with Tagwirei’s support oscillating between the two, causing significant tension.
While Chiwenga is seen as Mnangagwa’s likely successor by 2028, there are moves to extend Mnangagwa’s term until 2030, which Tagwirei seems to be funding.
Provincial chairpersons expressed frustration, noting Tagwirei’s dual financial support as a catalyst for internal discord.
The accusation against Tagwirei is not new; his involvement in ZANU PF politics dates back to the Mugabe era, where he secured numerous government contracts.
His financial maneuvers have been pivotal in Mnangagwa’s ascent to power, establishing him as a key figure in the party’s financial landscape.
However, his relationship with Chiwenga has seen fluctuations, with a recent warming up as Mnangagwa’s tenure nears its end.
This strategic realignment has been interpreted by some within the party as opportunism, rather than genuine loyalty to the current leadership.
The provincial leaders have called for Mnangagwa to address Tagwirei’s actions, fearing that his dual support could dismantle party unity.
Tagwirei’s international standing has also been impacted, with sanctions from the US and UK for allegedly supporting a rogue regime and benefiting from state contracts.
This international scrutiny adds another layer of complexity to his involvement in Zimbabwe’s political scene.
The unfolding drama within ZANU PF illustrates the intricate dance of power, loyalty, and ambition, where financial support could sway the political tide.
As the party navigates these turbulent waters, the actions of key figures like Tagwirei will be under intense scrutiny by both party members and the public.
The narrative of Tagwirei’s role in ZANU PF’s internal struggles is a testament to how business interests can intersect with political power in Zimbabwe.
This situation not only affects the party’s cohesion but also has broader implications for Zimbabwe’s political stability.
The upcoming years will be critical as the party decides its path, with Tagwirei’s influence potentially shaping or shaking the foundations of ZANU PF’s future.